Research

Dissertation

My current dissertation research at the University of Michigan focuses on the question of why some political parties institutionalize in clientelistic environments where party institutionalization is rare. I draw on several case studies in Thailand, where only one party (the Democrat Party) is widely accepted to have institutionalized in the past ninety years since Thai democracy began, while most parties have evolved into highly personalistic vehicles for individual founders or the tools of local clans. In this research, I hope to produce insights on the processes through which institutionalization occurs and unravels.


Publications

Journal Articles

Hicken, Allen, Napon Jatusripitak, and Mathis Lohatepanont. “A New Tale of Two Democracies? The Changing Rural-Urban Dynamics at Thailand’s 2023 General Elections.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 45, no. 3 (December 2023): 345–54.

Drawing on urbanization data and fieldwork observations of campaigning in the lead-up to the 2023 general election, we take a fresh look at Anek Laothamathas’ famous “Tale of Two Democracies” theory, which argued that there is a significant difference between how Thailand’s urban and rural voters behave. We find that rural and urban voters have now converged in significant ways, but there is still a distinct divide between densely populated urban areas and sparsely populated rural areas.

ISEAS Perspectives

Lohatepanont, Mathis and Napon Jatusripitak. “Causes and Effects of Pheu Thai’s Grand Compromise: The Lurking Instability of Thailand’s Post-2023 Party System.” ISEAS Perspectives 2024, no. 52 (July 2024).

In this ISEAS Perspective, we analyze the “grand compromise” between the Pheu Thai Party and the conservative parties after the 2023 general election, which resulted in a fundamental realignment of Thai politics. We unpack how a new strategic triangle has emerged between Thaksinites, conservatives, and progressives. This piece also proposes a new classification system for Thai political parties, based their stance on the status quo and the extent to which they successfully mobilized votes through nationally programmatic or localist strategies.

Jatusripitak, Napon and Mathis Lohatepanont. “After the Grand Compromise: Voter Profiles in Thai Politics.” ISEAS Perspectives 2025, no. 25 (March 2025).

A sequel to our previous piece, in this ISEAS Perspective we analyze voter attitudes in Thailand in the wake of the grand compromise between Pheu Thai and the conservatives and how partisan allegiances may shift as a result. We argue that Thai voters can be divided into four categories: reconciliatory conservatives, populist reformists, traditional conservatives, and progressive reformists; analysis of these voter segments reveal that they will likely respond differently to the grand compromise. This piece draws on original survey data conducted in 2023.



Policy Research

As part of the Innovation Policy for Sustainable Development team at the Thailand Development Research Institute, I contributed to several research projects related to Thai innovation policy.

Policy Reports

Rattanakhamfu, Sawaoruj et al. โครงการการจัดซื้อจัดจ้างภาครัฐเพื่อสนับสนุนนวัตกรรมผ่านมาตรการบัญชีนวัตกรรมไทย [Supporting public procurement for innovation through Thailand’s Innovation Catalog] (April 2022)

Rattanakhamfu, Saowaruj et al. การปรับโครงสร้างแรงงานสร้างสรรค์ในอุตสาหกรรมสร้างสรรค์ของไทยในยุคหลังโควิด-19 [Restructuring of creative workforce in the Thai creative industries in the post-Covid-19 era] (December 2021)